Flag Burning And Free Speech

Author: Robert Justin Goldstein
Publisher: Univ Pr of Kansas
ISBN:
Size: 50.31 MB
Format: PDF, ePub
View: 5557
Download Read Online
When Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag as part of a political protest, he was convicted for flag desecration under Texas law.

Flag Burning And Free Speech

Author: Robert Justin Goldstein
Publisher:
ISBN: 9780700610532
Size: 74.38 MB
Format: PDF, ePub, Mobi
View: 6708
Download Read Online
Discusses laws, court challenges, and issues regarding flag burning in the United States.

Texas V Johnson

Author: J. Anthony Miller
Publisher: Enslow Pub Incorporated
ISBN: 9780894908583
Size: 49.52 MB
Format: PDF, Mobi
View: 5722
Download Read Online
Covers the case of Texas v. Johnson, in which the question before the court was whether flag burning is an activity protected by the Bill of Rights.

Burning The Flag

Author: Robert Justin Goldstein
Publisher: Kent State University Press
ISBN: 9780873385985
Size: 22.97 MB
Format: PDF, ePub, Mobi
View: 5032
Download Read Online
Robert Justin Goldstein's Burning the Flag thoughtfully draws on the disciplines of law, political science and history to analyze the controversy in all its dimensions.

The Encyclopedia Of Civil Liberties In America

Author: David Schultz
Publisher: Routledge
ISBN: 1317457137
Size: 15.19 MB
Format: PDF, Mobi
View: 7097
Download Read Online
Paul J. Weber See also: First Amendment; Symbolic Speech; Texas v. Johnson;
United States v. Eichman. FURTHER READING Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G.
Walker. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties, and Justice
. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 2001. Goldstein, Robert
Justin. Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson. Lawrence:
University Press of Kansas, 2000. Welch, Michael. Flag Burning: Moral Panic and
the ...

The Encyclopedia Of American Civil Liberties

Author:
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISBN: 0415943426
Size: 17.82 MB
Format: PDF, ePub, Mobi
View: 5071
Download Read Online
Critics respond that a nation founded on principles of liberty must safeguard its
citizens' right to express dissent — even when that expression takes a form that
the majority finds offensive. Critics also object to the possible wide array of
legislative interpretations under the amendment regarding what constitutes either
"desecration" or "the flag." NICOLE B. CÁSAREZ References and Further
Reading Goldstein, Robert Justin. Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case o/
Texas v. Johnson.

Congressional Record V 146 Pt 3 March 21 2000 To April 4 2000

Author:
Publisher: Government Printing Office
ISBN:
Size: 71.61 MB
Format: PDF, ePub, Mobi
View: 7087
Download Read Online
The Flag Protection Act had originally been adopted by the 101st Congress after
the Supreme Court ruled in Texas v. Johnson that existing Federal and state laws
prohibiting flag-burning were unconstitutional because they violated the first
amendment's provisions regarding free speech. I profoundly disagreed with both
rulings the Supreme Court ... In 1989, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4
decision in the case of Texas v. Johnson, stated that the First Amendment
prevented a ...

Constitutional Law And The Criminal Justice System

Author: J. Scott Harr
Publisher: Cengage Learning
ISBN: 1337514799
Size: 41.44 MB
Format: PDF, ePub, Docs
View: 2538
Download Read Online
The Warren Court did not act on the flag-burning issue in this case, holding only
that Street's words were protected speech. The Court suggested, however, that
the burning of the flag could be prosecutable, even though it, too, was an act of
protest (Street v. New York, 1969). The landmark case in which flag burning as
symbolic speech was examined is Texas v. Johnson (1989). Gregory Johnson, a
demonstrator at the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, unfurled a
U.S. ...

The Hateful And The Obscene

Author: L. W. Sumner
Publisher: University of Toronto Press
ISBN: 9780802080837
Size: 15.91 MB
Format: PDF, Kindle
View: 7204
Download Read Online
The Hateful and the Obscene is an interpretation of freedom of expression that combines serious philosophical thought with a focus on Canadian law, thus offering the breadth capable of dealing with both obscenity and hate literature